Writing Archives - Page 29 of 50 - Addicted to Writing

Turn-Offs in Novels: Jargon, Foreign Languages and Detailed Description of Very Minor Characters

Posted on March 2, 2014 Written by Pinar Tarhan

I’ve fallen out with a novel I had eagerly bought. I picked it out the ways I always do. I went to one of my favorite bookstores (aka a big store with a decent, varied collection and offering comfy seating and quiet to explore), took 5-10 books whose premise (and genre) I was intrigued by and read a little. I chose the one that appealed to my current reading need: a fun, fast-paced, emotional romance novel. (While I’m also a huge fan of thrillers, I’m working on a romantic/comedy/drama manuscript myself, it makes more sense to research the market – seeing what sells while getting the escapism I need.)

And it started fine enough. For the first 50/100 pages or so, it was unputdownable. I read it on the bus, on the escalators, before I went to bed… If I wasn’t working (or resting my eyes), I was reading it. Sure, there were some wordy descriptions, a few mentions in a foreign language and some jargon related to the characters’ work. It set the mood. It was sort of relevant. I didn’t mind.

But then the characters dropped their foreign language randomly in their sentences regularly. Some characters were from that foreign country so it made sense. Regrettably, it wasn’t one of the languages I sort of spoke. No, they went beyond your typical travel phrases or widely-known vocabulary. Then there was the jargon rain. It kept coming and coming.

Now, the book is aimed more at a female audience. The romantic storyline, a typical female character (I’ll get into the “typical” in my next post) and even the job (decoration-related) probably made the majority of female readers happy. But, you see, when it comes to interior design, I’m more like a guy than a girl . I don’t have an extended furniture vocabulary . Sure, I love shopping and decorating myself, but I don’t want to know the name/root/history of every single thing. So the book slowed down further. I kept giving breaks and then coming back.

The third turn-off was the detailed description of the more minor characters- characters we run into once or twice as the reader. Yes, I could picture them all vividly, but it took me off from the plots and subplots. Now, there are some things the book did very well. The woven storylines, the setting and the dialogue were pretty good. But I started rolling my eyes way too often, and the initial love and enthusiasm disappeared.

The good news is, the book breaks some rules with novel-writing advice. It’s good news, because it proves you can follow your heart, write your novel your own way and get it published. The bad news is, this book isn’t a debut. So the writer had some leeway. First-timers don’t usually have this luxury.

Now, the point is this post isn’t to critique one particular book (hence the absence of the the title and the name of the author), but to spark a discussion about using other languages, jargon, and the amount of details insignificant characters deserve. Basically, this author hasn’t killed her darlings but has given birth to them over and over and over again.

How do you feel about the use of them? How generous are you with these when it comes to your fiction? As for my musings on “typical“ female character, that’ll be in my next post, so please stay tuned. Until then, you can check out the problem with following advice in this post The Problem With Following Advice, and Writing Your Novel Your Way.

So Everybody Knows How to Write Compelling TV… Or Do They?

Posted on February 17, 2014 Written by Pinar Tarhan

intelligence_tv_show — Intelligence starring Josh Holloway and Meghan Ory. Image via metslilled.blogspot.com.tr.

One of the gifts and curses of these blogging, social-media-savvy years is that everyone has got something to say about everything. It’s a gift, because it enables us to share our goals, dreams and writing with a lot more people than we could have imagined. As writers and bloggers, this is priceless.

However it also brings out the worst in some people. The more someone enjoys the anonymity of the Internet, the more likely they are to attack with no holds barred. Anyone who doesn’t enjoy or dislike any point of view is prone to name-calling and all sorts of criticism. And who gets some of the worst of these? Writers.

You should see some of the TV series’ boards on IMDB. The way some people “review” shows, you would think they were all trained pros who have been running the best, most intelligent shows you’ve watched.

Of course you can have an opinion. Of course you can argue. But why does politeness have to be sacrificed? And why is anyone against a certain opinion deemed stupid?

I don’t usually participate except when I see a completely civil board. But I do like to browse for research purposes (I run an entertainment blog) to see how people are reacting to certain shows, events, characters… etc. Anyhow, it is sometimes scary to see how passionately someone loves or hates a show.

Recently, I’ve developed a fondness for the sci-fi/action show Intelligence. It stars Josh Holloway (Sawyer of Lost) and Megan Ory (Red from Once Upon a Time). It’s fast, fun and full of action. It’s sometimes ridiculous, but never in an off-putting way. For me, that only increases the fun. I also love the one-liners numerous watchers seem to despise.

When a show’s concept revolves around a former kick-ass soldier with a computer chip in his brain that enables him to access pretty much anything electronic/online, you know you need a certain level of suspension of disbelief. I have no such problems when it comes to pure entertainment. (Yes,I liked Face/Off too. So what? We can’t always watch movies like The Hunt, which is excellent, but ultimately depressing.)

Now, back to Intelligence. Some claim it’s the worst show of this year. Some declare it the worst show ever. Of course this “accusation” pretty much goes to all the shows…Anyway, a few quite like it the way it is.

I don’t know why people can’t just relax, and let everyone have a good time with their tastes. There are so many shows I can’t stand, but I don’t waste my time crossing my fingers for their cancellation.

Now, as for why everyone is a writer:

For every show, the number of people cursing the writers is astounding. Many of the writers are regarded as stupid.” A kindergarten kid could do a better job”. Seriously? Then why are all the studios still after great stories? After all, if anyone who claimed they could do better than a show’s writers actually wrote and sold something better, surely all producers would be done looking for the next big thing.

I get that taste varies. I respect that. I don’t shy away from pointing out something I don’t like in a film, book or show. But wishing some parts could be done better is different to claiming, boldly and confidently, that you could have created something much more superior. And even if you could come up with something better, it still doesn’t give you the right to personally insult the writer’s skills.

What do you think about all these aggressive, “closeted” writers? Should they or shouldn’t they chill a bit? How do you react to such aggression when it is thrown upon your way?

When You Can’t Write and It’s Not Writer’s Block

Posted on February 14, 2014 Written by Pinar Tarhan

While writer’s block can be one frustrating ordeal, it’s not that hard to get rid of. I have some great suggestions on inspiration in this post: Finding Article Ideas & Writing About Them: 30 Inspiration Tips for Writers.

But if you are suffering from a physical condition that prevents you from writing, especially if it’s hand/arms-related, I recommend you head to Sophie Lizard’s Be a Freelance Blogger and read my post there. (Yeah, I’m quite psyched about being published there!:))

For more on writing inspiration, you can check out these posts:

To wait for inspiration? Or to chase it? That’s the question.

When Inspiration Is Chasing You, Get Caught!

My Girlfriend’s Boyfriend’s Writer Ethan: Finding Love, Inspiration & Getting Published

How to Jolt Back To Writing Non-Fiction From Fiction: 13 Tips

The Problem With Following Advice, and Writing Your Novel Your Way

Posted on February 1, 2014 Written by Pinar Tarhan

novel writing — Image via bang2write.com

How good are you at following advice? For me, there is no single answer to this question. It depends on where the said advice comes from (reliability), and whether or not it can match my personality traits and some very rooted habits. Meaning I won’t (and can’t) fool myself into thinking I can take the “get up early” tip of some writers, because before 9 o’clock, I’m cranky, useless, sleepy and yes, unproductive. So instead of having a staring contest with the blank sheets or screen, I get up a little later and get the most out of my awake self.

For instance, I adore John Grisham’s legal thrillers and dramas, but the fact that he got up two hours before work (as in before he headed to the law firm) while working on his first novel makes me think he is an (awesome) alien.

I’m sure you can relate. Maybe not to my sleeping habits, but to how I analyze and decide to internalize or chuck tips from successful people. I can work with “be organized”, because that’s sane advice. I might not be able to keep the tidiest house, but I will clean up the mess before I start working.

Where’s this coming from? I’ve been reading about agents and publishing since I started working on my novel, and while some of the tips make me say “Of course!”, some make me scratch my head and get a bit pessimistic. The latest collection of tips that inspired this post can be read here.

(Some of the tips I couldn’t agree more with are about “dream” starts, verbose paragraphs, laundry lists… Please refer to this post for these to make sense )

The good news is, following some viable advice, combined with a good story and hard work, can get you published. Bad news is, it might kill diversity.

I’m working on a romantic/drama comedy which will probably appeal more to women than man on the basis of its genre. Let’s assume I get published (I haven’t started pitching yet,) and a reader picked it up. Here’s what he/she won’t see:

– A main female character picking all her physical flaws and insecurities apart in several different places.

I read this sensible tip that says no one wants to read about physically perfect characters. They’re boring and/or hard to relate to. I agree.

But when I mentioned the “beauty” of my characters in this story, I referred to how other people perceived them. For instance one character is confident, playful, free-spirited and cute. She has no problem flirting with men, and this is observed by her friends. Maybe she has crooked teeth, or eyes that are too small for her face or she doesn’t like her nose much. Who cares? Her insecurities are irrelevant to her storyline, so I don’t mention them.

Or let’s take my leading male character. He’s described as handsome in a manly and outdoorsy way. He’s also smart, nice and extremely altruistic. So even before my female lead meets him, she is very intrigued. And because she finds his personality sexy too, she is drawn to him. While their chemistry dominates the scene, I don’t talk about if he is too tall or she’s too short or they’re going through a bad hair day. They might not be everybody’s type. They are certainly not perfect, whether physically or personally. No one is. But as far as their looks are concerned, they are perfect according to each other.

– First person present tense narrative from this main female character.

I love romance and comedy, and I read a lot of fiction with a female leading character, told from her perspective and in present simple. I like this type of narrative. It’s fun, captivating and quite addictive. But the problem is, as I identify with this 20-something, physically-not-perfect but-can-be- quite-alluring-with-the-right-style character who has some problems at work and her romantic life, I keep wondering what the other characters are like. I get how the lead sees them, but I never get to see what they truly think. You can show and not tell as much as you want, but you are still showing one character’s point of view.

I wanted to study from published and well-received romance novels so I could get an idea of how to tell a romantic drama/comedy using past tense, and with an omniscient narrative. I failed to find such books…There are many thrillers and dramas like this, but romantic comedies? Not really. (If you can think of some, please recommend away!)

So I fumbled through my first novel. I tried to use what worked for me as a reader, and what didn’t. I left out what bored me. I tried to produce the type of story that I’d like to read.

I’m not saying it reinvents the wheel. It doesn’t. I’m not saying it’s not unpredictable, or as catchy as the first-person narratives I’m a big fan of.

But this is the story I wanted to tell. I’m open to critiques, rewrites and notes on it. But since there are numerous authors who have been doing this so well for so long, maybe I can find an agent that will take a shot with me, because it’s a bit different.

I realize that some of the advice I don’t apply might work against me. But for the sake of this story being its own (and mine), I have to reject certain tips, and cross fingers that I made the right call.

As always, I welcome all your tips, experiences and opinions.

Recommended Posts on Fiction Writing

Challenges of Writing Your Novel (After Your First Draft) & Resources to Help You Survive and Thrive

Novel Writing Challenges Get Crazier: From 30 Days to 3 Days!

How to Jolt Back To Writing Non-Fiction From Fiction: 13 Tips